1996 Fleetwood brougham

[Kubla]

Why not? Cadillac sells one now

[guidematic]

But the question is, has anyone actually bought one yet.

Mike

[Kubla]

Why would anyone when you can get a volt for 20k less and it is the basis for the caddy

[guidematic]

The Cadillac looks better.

Mike

[Fins]

Nothing bias about that opinion, huh?

[guidematic]

Nah......   

Mike

[Fins]

Just like I'd take a Ford/Lincoln over a new Cadillac any day of the week/month/year.

[Otto Skorzeny]

Same here.  The Cadillac may be a better car - I don't know - but the Taurus and the Chrysler 300 are far superior in the looks department.

[Fins]

Chrysler 300. The Rolls Royce of the 'hood.

[Otto Skorzeny]

True, but they're big and comfortable and you can also see out the back window - unlike the new Cadillacs.

[guidematic]

See out of a Taurus? 

I talked to a few cops and that is their biggest complaint. Very poor visibility. As far as looks. Average genera-shock. Just not quite bizarre.

Mike

[Otto Skorzeny]

I was referring to the Chrysler in reply to Fins.  The Taurus is still easier to see out of than the Cadillac.

[guidematic]

Still, the Taurus suffers in the style department. The 300 is actually a good looking car. But I know you would never be convinced that anything from GM in the last 50 years was actually good looking.

Mike

[Fins]

Couldn't you have made it 60 years? 

There were tons of GM's in the last 50 years that could make a home in my garage. Fords, and Chrysler's too. I just can't find much that thrills me from anyone since really '79 or so.

[Otto Skorzeny]

I'll take most stuff from GM up to 72.  After that I wouldn't really want to own anything from any make but there are GM cars that look good to me after that.

I like the Eldos up to 85. I like the Rivs from 79-85.  I like the oval shaped Riviera, too.  Corvettes up to '82. Camaros and Firebirds up to '81.  Monte Carlos up to '76.  I like the big square Fleetwoods that hung on till the 90s.